Side-by-Side Comparison · 2026
FP Markets vs Pepperstone
An in-depth 2026 comparison of FP Markets and Pepperstone — regulation, fees, platforms, and who each broker is best for.
FP Markets
4.4
ASICCySECFSCA
Pepperstone
4.6
ASICFCACySEC+1
Feature Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | ASICCySECFSCA | ASICFCACySECFSCA |
| Min Deposit | $100 Winner | $200 |
| Max Leverage | Up to 1:500 | Up to 1:500 |
| Trading Platforms | MetaTrader 4MetaTrader 5cTraderIRESS | MetaTrader 4MetaTrader 5cTraderTradingView |
| EUR/USD Spread | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Account Types | 2 | 2 |
| Founded | 2005 Winner | 2010 |
| Our Rating | 4.4 | 4.6 Winner |
Our Verdict
Who should choose FP Markets?
FP Markets is best suited for traders who value very tight spreads and excellent execution.
With a minimum deposit of $100 and leverage Up to 1:500, it appeals to intermediate to advanced traders. Key advantages include tight spreads from 0.0 pips.
- Very tight spreads
- Excellent execution
- Strong regulation
- Higher minimum deposit
- Limited educational content
Who should choose Pepperstone?
Pepperstone suits traders looking for excellent execution speeds and very tight spreads.
Its minimum deposit of $200 with leverage Up to 1:500 targets intermediate to advanced traders. Standout features include ultra-fast execution.
- Excellent execution speeds
- Very tight spreads
- Strong global regulation
- Higher minimum deposit
- Limited educational resources